|
Given
at the seminary of La Reja, Argentina on the occasion of the
ordinations
2-18-2011
DICI
source
It was
good first of all because these meetings are clearly placed
on the doctrinal level. It involves a commission which has
as its objective the study of doctrinal questions, and which
does not have as its finality the consideration either
theoretically or practically of any kind of accord
whatsoever of a purely legal, canonical, or practical
nature. That question is totally excluded. And this was very
clearly stated. It is a discussion situated solely and
exclusively on the doctrinal level.
Secondly, it is a discussion about the Second Vatican
Council and the post-conciliar magisterium; to be precise,
on the Council and the post-conciliar magisterium. The
subjects, the themes, of which we shall treat have been well
established; they are the ones concerning all the questions,
all the themes, we have been critiquing for forty years,
especially religious freedom, the modern liberties, the
freedom of conscience, the dignity of the human person—as
they say—the rights of man, personalism, ecumenism,
interreligious dialogue, inculturation, collegiality—the
egalitarianism, the democratism, and the destruction of
authority that have been introduced into the Church; as well
as all the notions of ecclesiology which have totally
changed what the Church is: the question of the
“self-consciousness” of the Church, the Church as communion,
the Church as sacrament, the Church as the People of God;
and all these new ideas about the relation between the
Church and the world. Then there is the question of the
Mass, the new Mass, the new missal, the liturgical reform…,
and still other themes. We agreed to have a doctrinal
discussion on all these themes. And the most important
thing, which was very clearly established, is that the only
common criterion possible for these discussions is the
anterior Magisterium. I repeat: the only common criterion
possible, the sole criterion that we accept and that is a
condition sine qua
non for these discussions, is the magisterium
prior to the Second Vatican Council, the Magisterium of all
time, Tradition.
*****
I
consider that it was a good beginning if we look at the
methodology that was adopted. There will be meetings every
two or three months: every three months when a new theme is
to be taken up, and every two months when the same theme is
under discussion. If we begin on a theme and continue it,
the following meeting may take place in the next two months;
but if we have to prepare a new question, we need three
months’ time. And it was decided that the Society, whose
delegation I direct, will be first to submit a study of a
particular theme…. The Roman experts must answer us in
writing, and then, on the basis of these two documents, the
oral discussion will ensue, after which a written document
will be issued.
Everything is being recorded by their side and by ours, and
it is also being filmed. So, though for obvious reasons we
cannot relate everything that we are saying and studying,
everything will be documented: there will be a testimony
that is written, recorded, and filmed—before you, before the
Church, before God. At the close of each encounter, we will
draft a report showing if there was agreement (on points of
view) or not, and where the problem lies. The topic will be
defined and greater precision added, and upon completion of
each question, we shall compile a dossier to be forwarded to
the other members of the Congregation for the Doctrine of
the Faith, if the prefect judges it suitable, and to other
Congregations if there is a dicastery interested by the
theme under discussion; for example, the one on the Mass
will of course be made in collaboration with the
Congregation for the Liturgy and for Divine Worship. And
then, for each of the themes debated, a dossier, a written
summary, as I said, will be given to the pope and to the
superior of the Society.
Once
again, this commission’s objective is not to reach some kind
of doctrinal agreement, which would be deleterious. No. We
are simply going to bear witness to the faith, defend it, do
the good we can, and at any rate we shall defend the honor
of God, the honor of Our Lord, and the honor of the Church,
which is the main thing, if you have understood what I said
at the beginning [of this sermon] on the mediation and
function of the priest, and that is what matters.
*****
Our
interlocutors—I am referring here specifically to our
counterparts in this commission—are people with whom one can
speak. They understand our language, they understand what we
are saying, and they understand our objections very well. We
can speak peaceably and in all freedom, and that is enough.
If up to that point everything depended on our corresponding
with the grace of God, from now on we might say that
everything depends entirely on the grace of God, because
God, Our Lord, and He alone, is the inner Master Who can
illuminate minds and convert [wills]. Only God can touch
hearts. We are going there to preach—as I am doing right
now—but touch your mind or your heart, only God can do that,
and as we do not know God’s designs, we do not know where
this will go. What we do know for sure is that He can do
everything. For God nothing is impossible. He can convert
when He wishes, as He wishes, and whom He wishes.
*****
I am
giving you these explanations so that you may have some
measure of peace and reassurance. If these circumstances,
which seem to me absolutely sure, were to change, then we
would reconsider whether these discussions, these contacts,
should continue or not. We do know clearly what we are not
disposed to accept. If we do not know perfectly how things
may evolve, on the other hand we do know very clearly what
we have no intention of doing under any circumstance:
firstly, to yield on matters of doctrine, and, secondly, to
make a purely practical agreement. With these conditions and
with the disposition which is theirs to agree for the first
time to discuss the Council, for this is indeed the first
time they have given us the opportunity to present to them a
profound doctrinal critique based on the Church’s perennial
magisterium—it’s the first time! —clearly, we must do it.
Then, God will tell! Prudence shows us what we ought to do
now but not exactly what we should be doing in three or six
months because circumstances can change. Be that as it may,
what is clear for us is that the mission of the Society is
essentially, before all else, even before going to Rome, to
bear witness to the Faith. We must perpetuate, safeguard,
transmit, and live the true Catholic priesthood. We must
keep, defend, live, and transmit the true sacrifice of the
Mass. |