|
|
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
used on www.sspx.org |
|
|
| ECUMENISM
(FALSE) The description of this movement of dialogue and mutual
exchange on religious questions with non-Catholics, and this on a basis of
equality, is first made in a papal encyclical of Pope Pius XI, in Mortalium
animos, (On Fostering True Religious Unity), published in
1928.
This is the pope’s description:
Assured that there exist few
men who are entirely devoid of the religious sense, they seem to ground on
this belief a hope that all nations, while differing indeed in religious
matters, may yet without great difficulty be brought to fraternal agreement on
certain points of doctrine which will form a common basis of the spiritual
life. With this object, congresses, meetings, and addresses are arranged,
attended by a large concourse of hearers, where all without distinction,
unbelievers of every kind as well as Christians, even those who unhappily have
rejected Christ and denied His divine nature or mission, are invited to join
in the discussion. (§2)
Follows immediately afterwards the
pope’s condemnation
of "the panchristians", whose "fair and alluring words
cloak a most grave error, subversive of the foundations of the Catholic
Faith" (§3):
Such efforts can meet with no
kind of approval among Catholics. They presuppose the erroneous view that all
religions are more or less good and praiseworthy (this is the error of
indifferentism), inasmuch as all give expression, under various forms, to that
innate sense which leads men to God and to the obedient acknowledgment of His
rule. Those who hold such a view are not only in error; they distort the true
idea of religion, and thus reject it, falling gradually into naturalism and
atheism. To favor this opinion, and to encourage such undertakings is
tantamount to abandoning the religion revealed by God. (§2)
In his instruction on Ecumenism in 1949, Pope Pius XII
ordered that, in opposition to such "dangerous indifferentism",
"Catholic doctrine must be propounded and explained in its totality
and in its integrity. It is not permitted to pass over in silence or to
veil in ambiguous terms what is comprised in the Catholic truth on the true
nature and stages of justification, on the constitution of the Church, on the
primacy of jurisdiction of the Roman Pontiff, on the unique true union by the
return of separated Christians to the one true Church of Christ".
And yet, this is precisely what has not been done since
Vatican II, in attempting to follow the contrary request not to offend the
sensitivities of our "separated brethren" in the Vatican II
Decree On Ecumenism (Unitatis Redintegratio). This is
how that document defines Ecumenism, with none of the precautions laid out by
Pope Pius XII against indifferentism:
The term ‘ecumenical movement’ indicates
the initiatives and activities encouraged and organized… to promote
Christian unity (i.e., the apparent unity, outside the truth, of
different denominations or churches getting along). These are: first, every
effort to avoid expressions, judgments and actions which do not represent the
condition of our separated brethren with truth and fairness and so make mutual
relations with them more difficult.
The document also lists as other ecumenical activities
dialogue, cooperation for the common good of humanity and common prayer (U.R.
§4). These activities are all based upon the belief, already condemned in
advance by Pope Pius XI, that all religions are more or less good or
praiseworthy, expressed in this way in the Vatican II document on Ecumenism:
Separated communities and
churches as such…have been by no means deprived of significance and importance
in the mystery of salvation. For the spirit of Christ has not refrained from
using them as means of salvation. (U.R. §3; NB: Clearly this leaves no place for the
defined dogma, "Outside the Church, no salvation" Lateran
IV, Ds 802)
Nor must it be thought that
what is expounded in Encyclical Letters does not of itself demand consent,
since in writing such letters the popes do not exercise the supreme power of
their Teaching Authority. For…generally what is expounded and inculcated in
Encyclical Letters already for other reasons appertains to Catholic
doctrine.
(§20).
However, since they do not invoke the full authority of
the Church and are not infallible, they can be wrong. Needless to say they can
only be rejected or refused if they are in direct contradiction with
infallible teachings of the Church’s Magisterium. This is the case with the
teachings of Vatican II, which refused to use its charisma of infallibility.
It is an act of the Authentic Magisterium, which reiterates many dogmas
infallibly taught by the Extraordinary and Ordinary Magisterium, but which
also includes novelties, such as religious liberty, ecumenism and collegiality
which must be refused because they are in direct contradiction with the Church’s
previous teachings. e.g. Pius IX in Quanta Cura & Pius XI in
Mortalium animos.
Taken from
Questions
& Answers
by
Father Peter Scott.
|
|
|
INCARDINATION
(and excardination)
(Lat. cardo, a pivot, socket,
or hinge--hence, incardinare, to hang on a hinge, or fix; excardinare,
to unhinge, or set free).
In the ecclesiastical sense the
words are used to denote that a given person is freed from the
jurisdiction of one bishop and is transferred to that of another. The
term cardinare is used by St. Gregory I (596-604), and incardinare,
in the sense of inscribing a name on the list or matricula of a
church, is found in the ancient "Liber Diurnus" of the
Roman chancery. Excardination is the full and perpetual transference of
a given person from the jurisdiction of one bishop to that of another.
Incardination is canonical and perpetual enlistment in the new diocese
to which a given person has been transferred by letters of excardination.
The Council of Trent is most clear
in its legislation on these matters, as will be seen from the following:
Whereas no one ought to be ordained, who, in the judgment of
his own bishop, is not useful or necessary for his churches, the Holy
Synod, in the spirit of what was enjoined by the sixth canon of the
Council of Chalcedon, ordains that no one shall for the future be
ordained without being attached to that church, or pious place, for the
need or utility of which he is promoted, where he shall discharge his
duties, and may not wander about without any certain abode. And if he
shall quit that place without having consulted the bishop, he shall be
interdicted from the exercise of his sacred orders. Furthermore, no
cleric, who is a stranger, shall, without letters commendatory from his
own ordinary, be admitted by any bishop to celebrate the Divine
mysteries and to administer the sacraments. (Sess. XXIII, "De
Ref.", cap. xvi)
Excerpted from the 1913
edition of The Catholic Encyclopedia |
|
INDIFFERENTISM (RELIGIOUS)
The term given, in general,
to all those theories, which, for one reason or another, deny that it is
the duty of man to worship God by believing and practicing the one true
religion. This religious Indifferentism is to be distinguished from
political indifferentism, which is applied to the policy of a state
that treats all the religions within its borders as being on an equal
footing before the law of the country. Indifferentism is not to be
confounded with religious indifference. The former is primarily a theory
disparaging the value of religion; the latter term designates the conduct
of those who, whether they do or do not believe in the necessity and
utility of religion, do in fact neglect to fulfill its duties.
I. ABSOLUTE INDIFFERENTISM
Under the above general
definition come those philosophic systems which reject the ultimate
foundation of all religion, that is, man's acknowledgment of his
dependence on a personal creator, whom, in consequence of this dependence,
he is bound to reverence, obey, and love. This error is common to all
atheistic, materialistic, pantheistic, and agnostic philosophies... if the
human mind is incapable of attaining certitude as to whether God exists or
not, or is even unable to form any valid idea of God, it follows that
religious worship is a mere futility...
II. RESTRICTED
INDIFFERENTISM
In distinction from this
absolute Indifferentism, a restricted form of the error admits the
necessity of religion on account, chiefly, of its salutary influence on
human life. But it holds that all religions are equally worthy and
profitable to man, and equally pleasing to God. The classic advocate of
this theory is Rousseau, who maintains, in his Emile, that God
looks only to the sincerity of intention, and that everybody can serve Him
by remaining in the religion in which he has been brought up, or by
changing it at will for any other that pleases him more (Emile,
III).
This doctrine is widely
advocated today [this
article was written in 1913]
on the grounds that, beyond the truth of God's existence, we can attain to
no certain religious knowledge; and that, since God has left us thus in
uncertainty, He will be pleased with whatever form of worship we sincerely
offer Him... The fact is that this type of Indifferentism, though verbally
acknowledging the excellence and utility of religion, nevertheless, when
pressed by logic, recoils into absolute Indifferentism. "All religions
are equally good" comes to mean, at bottom, that religion is good for
nothing.
III. LIBERAL
OR LATITUDINARIAN INDIFFERENTISM
...[This
type of Liberalism] ... while
acknowledging the unique Divine origin and character of Christianity, and
its consequent immeasurable superiority over all rival religions, holds
that what particular Christian Church or sect one belongs to is an
indifferent matter; all forms of Christianity are on the same footing, all
are equally pleasing to God and serviceable to man...
Indifferentism springs from
Rationalism.
... Rationalism ... [is]
the principle that reason is the sole judge and discoverer of religious
truth as of all other kinds of truth. It is the antithesis of the
principle of authority which asserts that God, by a supernatural
revelation, has taught man religious truths that are inaccessible to our
mere unaided reason, as well as other truths which, though not absolutely
beyond the native powers of reason, yet could not by reason alone be
brought home to the generality of men with the facility, certitude, and
freedom from error required for the right ordering of life.
From the earliest ages of
the Church the rationalistic spirit manifested itself in various heresies.
During the Middle Ages it infected the teachings of many notable
philosophers and theologians of the schools, and reigned unchecked in the
Moorish centers of learning. Its influence may be traced through the
Renaissance to the rise of the Reformation.
From the beginning of the
Reformation the rationalistic current flowed with ever-increasing volume
through two distinct channels, which, though rising apart, have been
gradually approaching each other:
-
The
one operated through purely philosophic thought which, wherever it set
itself free from the authority of the Church, has on the whole served to
display what has been justly called the "all-corroding,
all-dissolving scepticism of the intellect in religious matters".
-
Rationalistic speculation gave rise successively to the English Deism of
the eighteenth century, to the school of the French Encyclopaedists and
their descendants, and to the various German systems of anti-Christian
thought. It
has culminated in the prevalent materialistic, monistic, and agnostic
philosophies of today...
Indifferentism,
liberal and infidel, has been vigorously promoted during the past half
century [of the 19th century!]
by the dominance of Rationalism in all the lines of scientific inquiry
which touch upon religion.
-
The
theory of evolution applied to the origin of man,
-
Biblical criticism of the Old and New Testament,
-
the
comparative study of religions,
-
archaeology,
-
and
ethnology,
in the hands of men who
assume as their primary postulate that there is no supernatural, and that
all religions, Christianity included, are but the offspring of the feeling
and thought of the natural man, have propagated a general atmosphere of
doubt or positive unbelief.
As a result, large numbers
of Protestants have abandoned all distinctly Christian belief, while
others, still clinging to the name, have emptied their creed of all its
essential dogmatic contents. The doctrine of Scriptural inspiration and
inerrancy is all but universally abandoned. It would not, perhaps, be
incorrect to say that the prevalent view today is that Christ taught no
dogmatic doctrine, His teaching was purely ethical, and its only permanent
and valuable content is summed up in the Fatherhood of God and the
brotherhood of man. When this point is reached the Indifferentism which
arose in belief joins hands with the Indifferentism of infidelity. The
latter substitutes for religion, the former advocates as the only
essential of religion, the broad fundamental principles of natural
morality, such as justice, veracity, and benevolence that takes concrete
form in social service. In some minds this theory of life is combined with
Agnosticism, in others with a vague Theism, while in many it is still
united with some vestiges of the Christian Faith...
...The only effective
barrier to resist its
[liberalism's]
triumphant march, leading scepticism in its train, is the principle of
authority embodied in the Catholic Church...
Excerpted from the 1913
edition of The Catholic Encyclopedia |
|
|
LIBERALISM
A free way of
thinking and acting in private and public life.
The word liberal is
derived from the Latin liber, free, and up to the end of the
eighteenth century signified only "worthy of a free man", so that
people spoke of "liberal arts", "liberal occupations". Later the term was
applied also to those qualities of intellect and of character, which were
considered an ornament becoming those who occupied a higher social
position on account of their wealth and education. Thus liberal got
the meaning of intellectually independent, broad-minded, magnanimous,
frank, open, and genial.
Again Liberalism may also
mean a political system or tendency opposed to centralization and
absolutism. In this sense Liberalism is not at variance with the spirit
and teaching of the Catholic Church. Since the end of the eighteenth
century, however, the word has been applied more and more to certain
tendencies in the intellectual, religious, political, and economical life,
which implied a partial or total emancipation of man from the
supernatural, moral, and Divine order.
Usually, the principles of
1789, that is of the French Revolution, are considered as the Magna
Charta of this new form of Liberalism. The most fundamental principle
asserts an absolute and unrestrained freedom of thought, religion,
conscience, creed, speech, press, and politics. The necessary consequences
of this are:
-
on the one hand, the abolition of the Divine right and of every kind of
authority derived from God; the relegation of religion from the public
life into the private domain of one's individual conscience; the
absolute ignoring of Christianity and the Church as public, legal, and
social institutions;
-
on the other hand, the putting into practice of the absolute autonomy of
every man and citizen, along all lines of human activity, and the
concentration of all public authority in one "sovereignty of the
people". This sovereignty of the people in all branches of public
life as legislation, administration, and jurisdiction, is to be
exercised in the name and by order of all the citizens, in such a way,
that all should have share in and a control over it.
A fundamental principle of
Liberalism is the proposition: "It is contrary to the natural, innate,
and inalienable right and liberty and dignity of man, to subject himself
to an authority, the root, rule, measure, and sanction of which is not in
himself". This principle implies the denial of all true authority; for
authority necessarily presupposes a power outside and above man to bind
him morally.
These tendencies, however,
were more or less active long before 1789; indeed, they are coeval with
the human race. Modern Liberalism adopts and propagates them under the
deceiving mask of Liberalism in the true sense. As a direct offspring of
Humanism and the Reformation in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries,
modern Liberalism was further developed by the philosophers and
literati of England especially Locke and Hume, by Rousseau and the
Encyclopedists in France, and by Lessing and Kant in Germany...
(B)
Ecclesiastical Liberalism (Liberal Catholicism)
-
The prevailing
political form of modern Liberal Catholicism, is that which would regulate
the relations of the Church to the State and modern society in accordance
with the Liberal principles as expounded by Benjamin Constant. It had its
predecessors and patterns in Gallicanism, Febronianism, and Josephinism.
Founded 1828 by Lamennais, the system was later defended in some respects
by Lacordaire, Montalembert, Parisis, Dupanloup, and Falloux.
-
The more theological
and religious form of Liberal Catholicism had its predecessors in
Jansenism and Josephinism; it aims at certain reforms in ecclesiastical
doctrine and discipline in accordance with the anti-ecclesiastical liberal
Protestant theory and atheistical "science and enlightenment" prevailing
at the time.
The newest phases of this
Liberalism were condemned by Pius X as Modernism. In general it advocates
latitude in interpreting dogma, oversight or disregard of the disciplinary
and doctrinal decrees of the Roman Congregations, sympathy with the State
even in its enactments against the liberty of the Church, in the action of
her bishops, clergy, religious orders and congregations, and a disposition
to regard as clericalism the efforts of the Church to protect the rights
of the family and of individuals to the free exercise of religion...
III.
CONDEMNATION OF LIBERALISM BY THE CHURCH
By proclaiming man's
absolute autonomy in the intellectual, moral and social order, Liberalism
denies, at least practically, God and supernatural religion. If carried
out logically, it leads even to a theoretical denial of God, by putting
deified mankind in place of God. It has been censured in the condemnations
of Rationalism and Naturalism.
The most solemn
condemnation of Naturalism and Rationalism was contained in the
Constitution De Fide of the Vatican Council (1870); the most
explicit and detailed condemnation, however, was administered to modern
Liberalism by Pius IX in the Encyclical Quanta cura of 8 December,
1864 and the attached
Syllabus.
Pius X condemned it again
in his allocution of 17 April, 1907, and in the Decree of the Congregation
of the Inquisition of 3 July, 1907, in which the principal errors of
Modernism were rejected and censured in sixty-five propositions. The older
and principally political form of false Liberal Catholicism had been
condemned by the Encyclical of Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos, of 15
August, 1832 and by many briefs of Pius IX.
The definition of the papal
infallibility by the Vatican council was virtually a condemnation
of Liberalism. Besides this many recent decisions concern the principal
errors of Liberalism. Of great importance in this respect are the
allocutions and encyclicals of Pius IX, Leo XIII, and Pius X and the
encyclicals of Leo XIII:
|
-
of 20 January, 1888,
On Human Liberty;
-
of 21 April, 1878, On
the Evils of Modern Society;
-
of 28 December, 1878,
On the Sects of the Socialists, Communists, and Nihilists;
-
of 4 August, 1879, On
Christian Philosophy;
-
of 10 February, 1880,
On Matrimony;
-
of 29 July, 1881, On
the Origin of Civil Power;
-
of 20 April, 1884, On
Freemasonry;
|
-
of 1 November, 1885,
On the Christian State;
-
of 25 December, 1888,
On the Christian Life;
-
of 10 January, 1890,
On the Chief Duties of a Christian Citizen;
-
of 15 May, 1891, On
the Social Question;
-
of 20 January, 1894,
On the Importance of Unity in Faith and Union with the Church for
the Preservation of the Moral Foundations of the State;
-
of 19 March, 1902, On
the Persecution of the Church all over the World.
|
Full information about the
relation of the Church towards Liberalism in the different countries may
be gathered from the transactions and decisions of the various provincial
councils. These can be found in the Collectio Lacensis under the
headings of the index: Fides, Ecclesia, Educatio, Francomuratores.
Excerpted from the 1913
edition of The Catholic Encyclopedia |
|
|
MODERNISM
"The synthesis of all heresies"
Pascendi
Gregis.
Etymologically,
modernism means an exaggerated love of what is modern, an infatuation
for modern ideas... In general we may say that modernism aims at
that radical transformation of human thought in relation to God, man,
the world, and life, here and hereafter, which was prepared by Humanism
and eighteenth-century philosophy, and solemnly promulgated at the
French Revolution. Perín (1815-1905), a professor at the
University of Louvain (from 1844-1889) described modernism as: "the
humanitarian tendencies of contemporary society," while he
defines the term itself as, "the ambition to eliminate God from
all social life."
Pope Saint Pius X
solemnly condemned modernism in his papal encyclical, Pascendi Gregis
in 1910 and set a watchdog over all Catholic seminaries and universities
to ensure that it could not be propagated amongst the clergy and the
laity.
Unfortunately, modernism
entered into the Catholic Church by means of infiltration and finally in
an open manner during the Second Vatican Council.
Excerpted in part from the 1913
edition of The Catholic Encyclopedia |
|
|
PRECONIZATION
(Lat. preaconizare, to
publish, from praeco, herald, public crier).
This word means:
-
In
its strict juridical sense the ratification in a public consistory
of the choice made by a third person of a titular of a consistorial
benefice, e.g., a bishopric. The Pope approves the election
or postulation of the titular made by a chapter, or ratifies the
presentation of a candidate made by the civil power ...
Excerpted in part from the 1913
edition of The Catholic Encyclopedia |
|
SYNCRETISM
From sygkretizein (not from sygkerannynai.)
An explanation is given by
Plutarch in a small work on brotherly love (Opera Moralia, ed.
Reiske, VII, 910). He there tells how the Cretans were often engaged in
quarrels among themselves, but became immediately reconciled when an
external enemy approached. "And that is their so-called Syncretism."
In the sixteenth century the term became known through the Adagia
of Erasmus, and came into use to designate the coherence of dissenters in
spite of their difference of opinions, especially with reference to
theological divisions. Later, when the term came to be referred to
sygkerannynai, it was inaccurately employed to designate the mixture
of dissimilar or incompatible things or ideas. This inexact use continues
to some extent even today... |
|
| |
|