|
|
|
What is Rome saying today
about Communion in the hand?
|
|
1-22-2011
In
February 2008, the Secretary of the Congregation for Divine
Worship called for reconsideration the practice of Communion
in the hand.
In the
preface to a new Italian-language book, Dominus Est,
on the Eucharist, written by Bishop Athanasius Schneider and
released in January by the Vatican's official publishing
house, Archbishop Albert Malcolm Ranjith (now Cardinal)
suggested that the reception of Communion in the hand has
contributed to a general sense of "carelessness"
about the Eucharist, as well as some flagrant abuses.
The
practice of receiving Communion in the hand was not mandated
by Vatican II, nor was it introduced in response to calls
from the laity, Archbishop Ranjith wrote. Instead, he
argued, an established practice of piety—receiving the
Eucharist kneeling, on the tongue—was changed "improperly
and hurriedly," and became widespread even before it was
formally approved by the Vatican. |
|
In
light of a widespread lack of reverence for the
Eucharist, the archbishop suggests that it is "high
time to review" the policy. While he does not
condemn the practice of Communion in the hand, the
Vatican official praised Bishop Schneider for arguing in
favor of the older practice, saying that it helps to
foster a proper sense of reverence and piety. |
 |
|
|
For several months now, Communion in the hand has not been
given in St. Peter's Basilica at Rome. The Holy Father is
giving Communion on the tongue to kneeled faithful. |
 |
However, this traditional practice is not back at Rome
as a rule for reason of principle. It is why many have
been shocked to see Benedict XVI giving Communion in the
hand to the Spanish Queen Sophia during his last trip in
Spain.
In his interview book
Light of the World,
the Holy Father explains his thought: |
|
I am not opposed in principle to Communion in the hand;
I have both administered and received Communion in this
way myself.
The
idea behind my current practice of having people kneel to
receive Communion on the tongue was to send a signal and
to underscore the Real Presence with an exclamation point.
One important reason is that there is a great danger of
superficiality precisely in the kinds of Mass events we
hold at St. Peter’s, both in the Basilica and in the
Square. I have heard of people who, after receiving
Communion, stick the Host in their wallet to take home as
a kind of souvenir.
In
this context, where people think that everyone is just
automatically supposed to receive Communion—everyone
else is going up, so I will, too—I wanted to send a clear
signal. I wanted it to be clear: something quite special
is going on here! He is here, the One before Whom we fall
on our knees! Pay attention!
This
is not just some social ritual in which we can take part
if we want to.
This
particular point illustrates how the way back to traditional
practice cannot be complete as long as the doctrinal reasons
and thinking would not lead it. In Liturgy, the prayer has
to be ruled by the Faith: “lex credendi—lex
orandi!” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|