On June 4, 2008, at the request of Cardinal
Dario Castrillon Hoyos, President of the Pontifical Commission
Ecclesia Dei, the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius
X, Bishop Bernard Fellay, went to Rome accompanied the
Second Assistant General, Fr. Alain-Marc Nely.
During the interview, he was given a memorandum
in the form of an ultimatum, demanding an answer by the end of the
month of June. On June 23, contrary to the established custom, the
Italian daily Il Giornale revealed the existence of the
ultimatum and, the next day, published its content in its online
edition. In the days following, the information was broadcasted by
all of the international press. Thus, to the urgency of the
ultimatum was added media pressure.
Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos’ document expressed
five demands: besides a positive answer requested before the end
of June, the Society of St. Pius X, in the person of its General
Superior, had to commit itself (1) “to give a response
proportionate to the pope’s generosity”; (2) “to avoid any
public comment which would not respect the person of the Holy
Father and would have a negative impact upon ecclesial charity;”
(3) “to avoid claiming a magisterium superior to the Holy
Father’s and not to set the Society in opposition to the Church;”
(4) “to demonstrate its will to act in all honesty and
ecclesial charity, and in the respect of the authority of the
Vicar of Christ.”
We must observe that the very general
— not to say
vague —
character of the demands singularly contrasts with the urgency of
the ultimatum. The conditions seem to be meant to obtain an
atmosphere favorable to a further dialogue, rather than imply any
precise commitment on definite issues. The Society of St. Pius X
wishes that the dialogue be on the doctrinal level and take into
accounts all the issues, which, if they were evaded, might
jeopardize a canonical status hastily set up. The SSPX considers
that the preliminary withdrawal of the 1988 decrees of
excommunication would foster serenity in the dialogue.
The SSPX does not claim the exercise of a
magisterium superior to the Holy Father’s, nor does it seek to
oppose the Church. Following in the footsteps of its founder, it
wants to hand down what it has received, namely “what has
always been believed everywhere and by all.” It claims as its
own the profession of faith addressed by Archbishop Lefebvre to
Paul VI on September 24, 1975: “Jesus Christ has entrusted to
His Vicar the charge of confirming his brethren in the faith, and
has asked him to make sure that every bishop faithfully keep the
deposit of the faith, according to St. Paul’s recommendation to
Timothy.”
In a letter to Pope Benedict XVI, dated June
26, 2008, Bishop Fellay answered in this sense. Cardinal
Castrillon Hoyos acknowledged receipt of the letter the next day.
Until further details are available, we will
make no comment.