Dear Friends and Benefactors of the Society of St. Pius X,
By the end of this month we hope to be residing in our new
district house in the outskirts of Kansas City. I thank you for your generosity
towards this project, which is also the first step of another project here at
the present building. As soon as we have moved, the former district house will
not only continue as the priory for Kansas City, but it will also serve as a
house of studies for priests who wish to join us in the fight for tradition.
Your continued spiritual and material support is very much appreciated.
Let us return now to the consideration of the training
children require and which is almost forgotten today. This month we will
consider the last of the 3-Rs, namely resourcefulness.
Let us begin by considering why it is important to train
children to be resourceful. We can easily answer this question by considering
the definition of resourceful. A resourceful person is one who is full of
resource or fertile in expedients, in other words, someone who is capable of
dealing with a situation or meeting a difficulty through the means afforded by
the mind or personal capabilities. We know, as adults, how we are faced with
numerous situations and difficulties each and every day. It is therefore not too
difficult to see how important this training in resourcefulness is.
A resourceful child is able to think more creatively and
flexibly and therefore, when faced with difficult problems, sees them as
opportunities for exploring, experimenting, adapting and inventing. A
resourceful child enjoys being challenged. When he overcomes one challenge he
looks for a higher one. If he falls short, he becomes even more determined.
Dejection and despair are seen as a waste of time and he applies to himself the
essence of "if at first you don’t succeed, try, and try again", which is
simply the virtue of perseverance.
How then do we teach our children to become resourceful?
First of all, it is important that parents are themselves
able to distinguish between what their children simply want and what they truly
need. This is important because children cannot do this for themselves. To a
child, the state of want and the state of need feel exactly the same. Their
wants become their needs and are more urgently expressed. Most of us have
probably witnessed the darling little child who throws a temper tantrum when
refused something he wants, e.g., candy or toys. The same child is likely
to also throw a fit when he is told that there will be no dessert until he eats
the meal set before him even if he doesn’t like it. It is therefore up to
parents to draw the line between wants and needs in every aspect of a child’s
life. In doing so they should understand that children want ten times the toys,
freedom, help with homework and other tasks, and even attention than they need.
Parents are obligated to give their children all they truly
need and only some of what they want. A child who is given an excess of their
favorite food at every meal will soon become sick. Likewise too much parental
attention will harm a child by keeping them from learning to stand on their own
two feet. When parents fulfill this obligation then children are given the
opportunity to figure things out for themselves and they learn how to organize
their time, occupy themselves, solve academic and social problems, and so on.
But when parents give excessively to their children, in whatever area, not only
do children not have to figure anything out for themselves, but they are
incapable of doing so and they will be unable to persevere in the face of
adversity or tolerate frustration.
Take for example the subject of homework. Years ago, when a
child went to school, he was informed that his homework was indeed his. More
often than not, when a child asked for help he was told "You can do that on
your own." The child learned that success was often less a matter of ability
and more a matter of keeping the nose to the grindstone (perseverance).
Today however, more often than not, a child doesn’t even have
to seek for his parents help. One of them (usually the mother) is sitting right
there beside him prodding him on to complete his homework. The child may get
good grades, but he is not learning to take initiative or manage his time
properly, or use trial and error, or set priorities. In short, he is not
learning to be resourceful or accept responsibility for himself and it should be
no wonder that such children are so often bored, or whiny, or dependent.
Another example is the number of things children possess.
Years ago, children were given very few toys and the few they had they took good
care of. Such children rarely complained of being bored. They simply learned to
do a lot with the little they had (resourcefulness). The wealth of resources the
mind contained more than compensated for the lack of material possessions.
This is quite a contrast with today’s children who have been
given all kinds of toys and gadgets. From day one such children are taught that
their ability to occupy and entertain themselves is in direct proportion to the
number of things they have and that only the latest and greatest thing will
bring them happiness.
This is not to say that parents who give their children what
they want necessarily intend any harm to them. Most parents want their child to
have a happy childhood. But, by pandering to their wants, they teach them to
chase after false notions of happiness, which will be detrimental not only to
their temporal and eternal welfare but also to the welfare of others dependent
on them later in life.
Nor should we expect children to solve every problem on their
own. Proper supervision requires that parents step in at times to buffer,
deflect, or even eliminate certain problems, especially if dangerous. However,
the fact remains that parents cannot run constant interference for children and
then expect that as adults they will successfully anticipate and deal with
life’s numerous problems on their own. Parents then have an obligation to help
their children stand on their own two feet.
Sincerely in Christ the King,
Fr. John D. Fullerton