I am not the best placed person for writing you
this letter. I do not think that I shall obtain from you the assent that you
declined to the bishops of the Society (of St. Pius X), Bishop Fellay and
Bishop de Galarreta, when they tried to show you the fearful damage that
these accords between you and the Vatican could inflict on the Church and on
the fight for the "survival of Tradition." Nevertheless, I have a very
serious reason for writing you about this, and I do so with the advice and
approval of Bishop Fellay himself. The reason is that several of our
faithful at Niteroi and Rio come from villages you are responsible for, and
they have always held the "Campos Fathers" in the highest esteem and
reverence. Now they cannot manage to understand the reason for an agreement
(with Rome) made separately from the Society of St. Pius X and which,
moreover, goes against the counsel and advice of the Society bishops.
Another reason that encourages me to write you
is the experience I lived through in 1988 at Barroux, when Dom Gerard Calvet
too wanted to make a deal with the Vatican.
Here is the first similarity I see between
Dom Gerard’s attitude and yours: Archbishop Lefebvre had just refused an
agreement because he had not been able to perceive in the Vatican’s
intentions the guarantees that would be necessary to assure the survival of
Catholic Tradition. Dom Gerard, placing the particular interests of his
monastery above the Church’s good, accepted a separation from Archbishop
Lefebvre in order to "normalize" his juridical and canonical status, thereby
letting fall the sword of combat.
Today, equally, the Society has just
rejected an accord for the same reasons as Archbishop Lefebvre, and you
prefer to consider your particular interests and not the common good of the
Church. You have grown weary of the daily fight and of being marginalized.
But the similarities do not stop there.
When your Fraternity was conducting the current
negotiations, I spoke to Fr. Fernando (Rifan) on the phone. He gave me three
reasons that he considered sufficient for going ahead and concluding the
agreement, even though the Vatican has not agreed to allow the Tridentine
Mass:
-
many new persons would rejoin Tradition;
-
we would have a foot in the door of modernist
Rome for preaching Tradition;
-
we could still go back to our former position in
case we were unduly pressured.
These are precisely the same arguments as
those of Dom Gerard in 1988; to me, shockingly so. Firstly, because then you
knew how to critique Dom Gerard’s position, as was so necessary at the time.
Second, because today the logical conclusion you are obliged to reach is
that Dom Gerard was right! He preceded you by ten years, which obliges you
to believe that his assessment then was better than yours.
I think that the following affirmations
are undeniable:
-
The new people that will join you will not desire
to convert to true Tradition. They will come to you because the legal
obstacles have been removed, and not for reasons of faith. They will be
very sympathetic, but they will not be seeking the whole truth with the
doctrinal conviction that leads souls to martyrdom;
-
Being in modernist Rome —and this is
proven —invariably results in contamination by the guiding principles of
Vatican II, administered in homeopathic doses until the fruit falls, as
the Fraternity of St. Peter fell;
-
As for going back: who among them has ever
returned to his former position? They would rather concelebrate with the
pope than go back. And if they did go back, what would become of the
faithful in their parishes? Would they all go back? How many would be
entangled over the question of legality? I consider such an attitude
reckless; it does not take into account the constancy of the souls that
Providence has entrusted to you. You regularize on paper a phony problem
of excommunication, and the faithful have only to follow and obey, and
then, tomorrow, to about face and retreat with you!
I cannot quite see in this the respect for souls the priestly life
requires.
With regard to the Society of St. Pius
X, I do not understand how you can so obstinately refuse the requests of
these bishops who have come to your aid time and time again. First, there
was the consecration of Bishop Licinio Rangel, a very courageous act by
these bishops, for many could misconstrue this act, as was the case for
some. It was by thinking of you and of your faithful that they agreed to the
consecration. Also, the seminaries of the Society have always been open to
the Campos seminarians; they are received as brothers. And then, when the
Society was summoned to negotiate with the Vatican at the beginning of 2001,
you were amiably invited to participate (in the meetings of the Society’s
superiors). They were not obliged to include you, yet, once again, they were
generous and fraternal in the fight for Tradition.
In view of these facts, by refusing to
listen to the supplications of the Society, you incur the terrible burden of
betrayal. In that, once again, you match Dom Gerard. Perhaps you do not see
the matter thus, but neither can you deny the bishops the right to feel
betrayed.
And just as Dom Gerard’s betrayal caused a
terrible drama amongst the French faithful, causing divisions in families
and deep disappointment because of this abandonment and weakness, likewise
you also, today, are for the Brazilian faithful the cause of the same
disappointment and the same divisions.
I said in 1988 to Dom Gerard what I repeat
to you today: thousands of the faithful anxiously wait for you to confirm
them in the Catholic faith, in the combat that Divine Providence requires of
us, without our succumbing to fatigue, weakness, or the siren song of
legality. What our Lord requires is martyrdom endured drop by drop, and a
clear and simple profession of Catholic faith without compromising with the
modernists in the Vatican. The pope, yes; legality, yes; but above all,
respond to God’s clear call to the combat of the faith. The day the pope
really converts, it will appear more clearly than the light of day.
Obviously, it is not by kissing the Koran or by going to pray in a mosque
that he manifests this conversion.
All the faithful of the chapels of Rio and Niteroi are praying for you, beseeching the Blessed Virgin Mary to turn your
hearts to the light of truth.
In Christo et Maria,
Dom Lourenço Fleichman, OSB